In many places new homes are needed but the only space available for building them is in the countryside Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there What is your opinion about this

Over-population has been a major reason for the increased requirement of housing in several places around the world. The limited available space for building houses in urban areas has led to a diversion in the countryside in many places. While some are of the opinion that it is essential to protect the suburban area by not constructing homes, I believe, that it is necessary for the population to evenly spread out throughout the city for avoiding crowding in specific areas.

As the years will pass by, there will be more and more need to accommodate the residents of a city. In addition to the necessity of building residential buildings, there will be an equal requirement for offices, factories and other establishments. If the population is restricted to be living in one area, it will lead to a lot of inconveniences to the people, for instance, increased traffic and congestion throughout the day. The locals will eventually face the repercussions caused to their health and comfort by means of pollution and poor space management. As a result, the life of the citizens will be adversely affected due to the ill-management of the city area.

The possible solution to this problem is by moving towards other areas of the city. This will create a balance of the population and make a comfortable living for all. To add with, people will find it easier to travel without traffic and suffocation from one place to another in no time. Furthermore, the improved standard of living of the people will hereby result in an increased economic development of a country.

To conclude, an equal distribution of the public throughout the city will not only benefit the residents, but also contribute towards the growth of the country. If proper planning is undertaken to implement this, it will result in a great success for all.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96103896104 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9944782489 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529220779221 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5759554819 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15756979472 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572384099534 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555515511112 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966865878805 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586589942142 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.