In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
With the growing population in the urban areas, cities are gradually reaching a saturation point. This leaves the authorities with no choice but to plan building new homes in the countryside. While some people resist this notion and argue that the beauty of the rural side must be preserved, I believe it is imperative to take some steps to accommodate the growing population. In the following paragraphs I will discuss the reason for my opinion.
Urbanisation has caused the cities to be overpopulated. Many people move to big cities to create better standard of living for themselves. Consequently, this influx has caused the ratio of number of houses available to population to tip in the direction of the latter. There are some houses that rent out their rooms to minimise the cost but even then it is not enough homes to accommodate this growing demand. In fact, this also puts a strain on the other resources available in the cities.
Therefore, building new homes will be a welcoming solution. New living places will open options for new businesses to be set up in rural areas. Consequently, not only there will be more job opportunities but the pressure will be minimised on the urban areas.
Furthermore, Government could take some initiatives to preserve the essence of countryside. More trees could be planted and there could be open spaces in every neighbourhood with in built lakes.
In conclusion, I believe in order to support the growing population it is imperative to build new places to live in the countryside. This will not only create opportunities for the people but also help reduce strain on the resources. Meanwhile, the authorities could also take some measures to preserve the essence of the countryside.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of living for themselves. Consequently, this influx has caused the ratio of numb...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03460207612 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93285613272 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477508650519 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3157819748 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5882352941 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27083497185 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868759980077 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669597118951 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147174293498 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536586247047 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.