Men do most of the high-level jobs. Should governments encourage a certain rate of these jobs to be for women?
In recent decades, it is true that the majority of people who work as senior professions are males, while the number of females in the same field account for a little proportion. As far as I am concerned, I think that more occupations should be given to females by the states. This following essay aimed to examine the major reasons for my opinions.
Admittedly, there are a number of contributing factors for why letting women get a high-ranking position in an enterprise may reap certain benefits. Initially, gender equality in a society might be boosted dramatically. Evidently, the jobs which men are offered are assigned to the female, which shows the vitality of women in a community due to the fact that they not only convey the message that they can hold a superior title as males but also become a good model for young girls. What is more, this policy will release pressure on the labor market which is a scarce upper resource as well as help to restructure. Without such rule, gender inequality and the lack of human sources would put the society into the chaos that leads to the crisis.
It is vividly the fact that the more money these females earn, the more taxes they would pay to assist the community and the state with governmental systems such as health care, education, and infrastructure, etc, which means it releases the heave burden on the authority. Not to mention that a variety of females in an abundance of nations appointed to a leader of a country or chief executive officer of multinational company and they are also the most powerful females on a global scale such as Angela Merkel who is Premier Minister of Germany or Mary Barra - Managing Director of General Motor firm, which means women can do better than man in some areas of employee relying on themselves’ talent as well as they possess more excellent element than the opposing gender.
In conclusion, it seems to me that more females are assigned to the high title, bring about more merits than drawbacks. Therefore, enacting policies by the states to let females hold a high level is a completely judicious decision.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, therefore, well, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79726027397 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69123325279 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.510519624 49.4020404114 238% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.916666667 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4166666667 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154496175619 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512133586682 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382645417063 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835569271071 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290876663753 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.