Nowadays, how to decrease the poverty index, especially in poor countries, has become a controversial issue. Although some believe the best way to eliminate poverty in poor countries is to support them by money, others believe that this solution does not work, and insist on non-cash donations like bootstraps and transfer of knowledge and experience. This essay will argue why money alone is not the solution to the problem of poverty in poor countries, and other types of aid given by rich countries are completely necessary.
There are hundreds of charities all around the globe, which believe that giving money to third-world countries, by most developed countries, is the main solution for eradicating penury. They believe that it helps governments to improve and rebuild their economic infrastructure and development of inter-rural and inter-urban roads, which leads gradually to decrease the poverty rate index. For instance, developing roads and transportation makes accessibility of food, water, and such things to all sections of society at cheaper prices, which leads to removing poverty problems. These instances have bolstered the donation of money suggested as the best and easiest way to aid poor countries.
Despite some effects of aiding money on poor society may have, various types of solutions have been suggested by economic experts which are proved have more effective. Bootstraps, which means starting a business without external help or working capital, and helping to develop the education system is the most effective favor which rich countries can do for poor ones. For example, the knowledge of how to starting low-cost businesses, in addition to the bootstrap process, can help many people to start their simple and small business and making money. Overall, the idea that helping poor communities is possible only through the donation of money is rejected, and there are very effective methods that can be easily implemented by wealthy countries.
This essay discussed why removing poverty from poor countries just by donating money, is impossible, and trying some other ways from most developed countries is entirely necessary. In my opinion, helping poor societies by non-cash methods such as what argued above is an absolute imperative not only for eradicating poverty but also for maintaining indecency.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, third, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41095890411 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80175534073 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539726027397 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.9991298183 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.923076923 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0769230769 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279795167444 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103391957402 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695839941168 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180434301463 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627850729204 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.