Over from last few years, with the advent of modern technologies, businesses and society are continously progessing and benefiting in almost every way. In established businesses, professionals conduct business meetings , dealings over the phone and video channels. In past times, almost every communication was time consuming due to non-existance of modern technology. Many people think that companies as well individuals should choose modern technologies for commnucation and avoid face to face interactions.
There are clearly many advantages from communication technologes both to businesses and individuals. To being with, in current times, companies are running high-tech projects with teams across onshore and offshore. Businesses have to communicate day and night across all the shores and telecommunication and network technologies are the only means of talkas meeting everytime is just not possible due to cost and time matters. Also company interviews can take place over the phone and video calls to assess the candidate’s capabilities before taking the next step of meeting in person. Secondly, these days, people plan and send ceremony invitations over the social mobile applications to their relatives and friends, thus saving the money, cost and commuting time.
However, although evolution of telecommunication technolgies has made our life easier, there are also certain demerits. First of all, there is a risk of someone playing notorious over the communication channels without letting the other person know about it. For example, these days several incidents have been reported where people develop trust over each other only by communicating on the social website and do not meeting in person. Such relations late fail to mature.
In conclusion, advantages of technology for communication so much that today people and companies cannnot survive without teecommunications. However, people and businesses should be more alert and should not have blind faith on the other without have face-to-face conversations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... professionals conduct business meetings , dealings over the phone and video chann...
^^
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Many people think that companies as well individuals should choose modern technol...
^^
Line 1, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on and avoid face to face interactions. There are clearly many advantages from c...
^^^^
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dvantages from communication technologes both to businesses and individuals. To b...
^^
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
... both to businesses and individuals. To being with, in current times, companies are r...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... possible due to cost and time matters. Also company interviews can take place over ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 715, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bile applications to their relatives and friends, thus saving the money, cost and...
^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le develop trust over each other only by communicating on the social website and ...
^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on. Such relations late fail to mature. In conclusion, advantages of technology ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75496688742 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22246766248 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622516556291 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1766101109 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.866666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251336715793 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792313305656 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775019698113 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154980542105 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648435789004 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.