More and more people are moving away from an agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work.
What Will be the consequences of this? What solutions can you offer?
In the quest of living contemporary and wealthy life, rural people have been acculturating in metropolitan areas. So many villagers are leaving agricultural work and rush to the cities for better opportunities and job profiles. There is severe devastated consequence of this trend and solutions for these are discussed in this essay.
The hype is created by metro cities’ citizen that they are living better life than rural people in every aspect of life. Secondly, people always presume that better occupation means fat money and health lifestyle. Thus, farmers are encouraged to look for better work profiles which could be easily available in cities, but consequences of this are far more dangerous than anyone can imagine. In fact, inclination of agricultural backgrounded people toward cities are so dangerous that if this will continue for more than couple of year than arable land will be vanished in such a way that it is nearly impossible to recover that land. In other words, there will be no rural areas in near future only metro cities which can accommodate more than billions of people. For example, In China all the villagers are aiming at the one city which is Shanghai, as a result, all the rural areas within 500 miles have been minimised and accommodated as a suburb of the city. Now even though they want to resettle in their hometown they can not due to the limited fertile land.
There are many solutions for this predicament. First of all government of the respective county could avail all the facilities which is there in cities to far-flung areas. For instance, American government had taken this decision and apparently successful to stop the influx of farmers to nearby metropolitan areas. Secondly, Vertical farm is also useful utility introduced by some scientist recently where within big buildings farmers can cultivate needed agricultural products but vertically along with the skyscraper walls. For example Chinese government adopt this new solution so, those who badly want to settle in city can assimilate without loosing their profession.
To conclude, grass is always greener from the other side. Many of the farmers influenced by the hype and then repenting on their decisions on settling themselves in cities. I believe if all the basic facilities can be availed at remote areas like cities then no person with agricultural background encouraged to leave their premises. Otherwise, the days are numbered where next generation would not see villages and traditional farms.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 408.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19362745098 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75585144304 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553921568627 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1377870014 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.526315789 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277690263466 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814706808775 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680875931158 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157910633571 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059081307997 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.