Despite use of private automobiles has detrimental effects on environment, an increasing number of people prefer commuting by them. This essay will examine reasons of this and offer suggestions to persuade citizens use public transportation facilities more.
First of all, many people commute by automobiles due to countless reasons. One of the primary reason is that owning a car demonstrates wealth of a family in majority of cases. Many people who are prosperous purchase innumerable luxurious, affluent automobiles. In many countries, it is considered that internal bus facilities are commenly used by less affluent individuals. Further and more importantly, purchasing a car does not cost a lot in many cases. Owning it in countries such as Canada and Germany is very convenient since many citizens can purchase their own vehicles with two or three months wages. For example, a study by World Forum Magazine in 2018 revealed that 95% of people in Manila where their are not any taxes on vehicles have more than two cars although there are effective subway and bus transportation systems.
Secondly, goverments can motivate people use them more by taking innumerable steps. Providing high capacity facilities can be motivational. Buses and trains can be crowded during rush hours in many urban areas which make workers unhappy and tired. If there were more seats available, commuters would have a comfortable traveling experience that is vitally important for many. Increasing number of buses and routes can also be beneficial. Many people have to spend long hours at stations to travel consequently if there were buses each ten minutes at stations, they would become the most popular way of transportation. For instance, a report by Goverment of Manila in 2017 reported that 99% of country dwellers prefer travelling by cars whereas 80% of city dwellers prefer commuting by trains and buses since there are many means of transport there.
By way of conclusion, in todays' world, travelling by automobiles is highly popular because of it's price and social value but high capacity transportation facilities and more routes can motivate people use them more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Despite use of private automobiles has d...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...public transportation facilities more. First of all, many people commute ...
^^^
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...aled that 95% of people in Manila where their are not any taxes on vehicles have more...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 841, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... subway and bus transportation systems. Secondly, goverments can motivate ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 825, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun means seems to be countable; consider using: 'many means'.
Suggestion: many means
...ing by trains and buses since there are many means of transport there. By way of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are many means of transport there. By way of conclusion, in todays world, t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utes can motivate people use them more.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29275362319 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91774226274 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576811594203 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6075650361 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.411764706 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270527026184 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083620587401 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647492756165 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173593133883 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365617052116 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.