More and more people have started to discuss whether learning and working remotely is a positive or negative trend. Some might argue that working without the physical presence in the office and learning without staying in the classroom is a great thing; however, some might have different opinions on this matter. From my perspective, I believe that this a positive trend.
The first reason is that we can fully arrange our own time. As we all know, when we work in the office or study in school, we might be distracted by our colleagues or classmates, because they always want to chit-chat with us. I can still remember the last time when I was busy with my final school project. At first, I worked on it by myself at home and can complete 20 percent of the whole thing within 3 hours. However, when I did that in our research room where there are other postgraduate students, I did nothing within 3 hours, since people in that place come to me and chat for hours.
Some people might claim that we are too lazy to work or study without other's monitoring. That is to say, human beings are lazy in nature can tend to do nothing if the environment is cozy or comfortable. At first glance, their argument seems to be valid; nonetheless, they have ignored some important factors. Even though we are lazy, we still can finish the work or study if there are some tasks set for us.
Indeed, some people might not agree what I have proposed on this matter. They might claim that lazyness of humnaities would suppress the diligence. However, I believe that we can learn and work better without others' interruptions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rk better without others interruptions.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63066202091 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46189377869 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.158987138 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173361573564 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606336043128 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706472453278 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990089832774 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388326514507 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.