Most companies and organizations required their employees to wear uniform to work.
What are the jobs that need this uniform to make it a good thing?
What are the disadvantages of wearing uniforms to work?
Nowadays, it is often argued that what should be the proper attire in offices. Many work-places have set rules and guidelines for compulsory uniform that staffs have to wear at work. In this essay, I am going to explore, what makes wearing particular unifrom at work advantageous, and some of the drawbacks related to these dresses at work.
One major positive aspects of wearing designated attire to offices is that it reflects professionalism. It not only eye-appealing to customers but also contemplate as part of work ethics. In addition to this, it also helps in defining the hierarchy of work-place. For example, in hospitals, doctors and nurses wearing unifroms help patients to identify the right person whom they have to contact. Furthermore, in some of organizations these unifroms act as protective gears for the people who wear them. To illustrate this, in hotels, chefs wear chef coats as it guards them against fire.
Nevertheless, a notable drawback of these mandatory uniforms is that people get tired of their daily dress-ups. As mentioned before, there are some professions which have defined set of dress to work for their staff, abiding to such rules on daily basis may become boring for some. Additionaly, another aspect to consider is that who are responsible for the maintainance of those uniforms. For example, in some companies, staffs have to take care of their laundry and repair by their own, this could be a downside for these individuals.
To sum up, while there are some benefits of conforming the regulations of uniforms to work, however, there are some disadvantages related to it as well. Therefore, it is important to contemplate a viable approach to it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cular unifrom at work advantageous, and some of the drawbacks related to these dresses at w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the organizations') or simply say ''some organizations''.
Suggestion: some of the organizations; some organizations
...m they have to contact. Furthermore, in some of organizations these unifroms act as protective gears ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09677419355 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92951502784 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5338266346 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275345262021 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086530775581 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644240951855 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170477954097 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788447032445 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.