Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion?
Interview are the most common way of recruiting the people and followed by almost all kinds of organization such as corporates, NGO, governments etc. Some people doubt this method of selection and believe other ways should also be exercised. I believe, though interview is the most effective option for selection of employee, some additional measures can also be opted.
Undoubtly, people are recruited based on the performance in an interview and interviewer assesses the various characteristics of person. During an interview, panel may assess the communication skills by asking the candidates to talk on topic for 2-3 minutes. In addition, aptitude level can also be judged based on the logical question which required analysis skills to resolve the problem. Furthermore, interviewee’s command in the required area such as computer, electrical etc. can also be validated through expert member in panel. For instance, I am part of my organization interview panel and judge the computer programming knowledge through real scenarios.
Despite these measures in an interview, sometimes it is seen that employee when put in live situations are not able to perform as expected. It is generally said that it is not possible to judge the person in small interaction during interview. Some candidate mug up all possible questions which can be asked in an interview and deceive the panel. Therefore, extra measures are needed to catch these scenarios as it cost a lot to an organization. Firstly, background check may be done which ensure that employee credentials are trust worthy and his past is not involved in any kind of criminal activities. Secondly, candidate’s manager can be contacted to find out the skill level and working attitude.
To conclude, Interview method will continue to be most used method, however, wherever the positions are in specialized area or for higher position, extra precautions may be taken to avoid post recruitment resentment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Interview are the most common way of recruiting the p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36129032258 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11108253625 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590322580645 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1423444722 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978734637108 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348679081096 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310054677038 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697565266207 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232419821436 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.