Most people believe that stricter punishment should be given for traffic offences. To what extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

Most people believe that stricter punishment should be given for traffic offences. To what extent do you agree?

Most of the metropolitan cities face the issue of congested traffic. The careless driving and disobeying of traffic rules adds to the burning problem. A large section of society opines that person breaking the traffic regulations should be penalised heavily. I too support this view to a large extent believing that fear of punishment can only resolve this menace.

We all know that the traffic rules has its importance and should be followed obediently. However, there are people who do not care for such laws in the country. As an example, people drive bike without helmet or do not stop at the signal. Admittedly, the rules are made for the safety and proper flow of traffic but rarely some people understand. In this case, if they are fined for not wearing a helmet, next time they would make sure that they own a helmet while driving a motor-bike. Thus, legal punishment can only ascertain that mistakes are not repeated.

Secondly, traffic punishments create awareness among the people, which will guide them to drive safely and securely, without harming others as well. In this case, people would try to understand what is the correct way of driving and what could lead them to penalty. Ostensibly, such knowledge is beneficial for every individual as well as for the smooth movement of vehicles in the city. Therefore, in every case strict punishments prove better option to control the traffic.

In conclusion, I pen down saying that traffic offenses should not be ignored and strict punishment is the only solution to avoid the problems of careless driving and crowding the roads. The government should definitely frame stricter punishments for violating the traffic rules.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59778260336 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584229390681 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0915357252 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.125 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336572465121 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102419887675 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509885645149 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195777002313 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308742694565 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.