News stories on tv and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is your opinion about this?
As the world develops, the news is broadcasting 24/7 either on television or in newspapers. Accordingly, a substantial proportion of people has prompted to have a vigorous debate whether to broadcast news with pictures or with words. In my opinion, I sincerely believe that both are important as they complete each other but there are some considerations.
Firstly, news media propagate with pictures since it assists in conveying the message to the audience. For example, when public read Daily Mail newspaper, photos are significantly prevailed on the each paper of the news. As a result, it contributes to envisage the story which can be easily understood.
Words are inevitably deemed as a paramount factor as well because they not only provide more details about the story but also associate with comprehension the news. To illustrate this, if news published without words, it would be either incomprehensible or ambiguous. Consequently, Words, which play an important role, cannot be apart from news.
However, there are some precautions which should be considered while promulgating the news as there could be some harsh scenes that are inappropriate for either children or families. For instance, some news media take advantage of broadcast pictures contain a severe view during a war in order to attract more audience as it helps to earn more profit. Therefore, in these occasions, I think it better to just publish news in words.
In conclusion, I think that words and pictures have the same importance when propagating news. Nevertheless, tough news should be solely in words.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28235294118 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03868180004 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596078431373 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.462089681 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2142857143 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.1428571429 7.06120827912 200% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23372337206 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805078707088 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310290058416 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13028562436 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329842163961 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.