News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinion about this?

In many countries news on TV and in a newspapers occasionally included with photos and I believe that photos are more influential than words in many cases.

Some people are more confident with photos appearing in a newspaper or TV. I would believe that what they see will be accepted as facts and can not be changed easily. Also, the pictures are suitable for illiterated people who would accept instantly without any doubts. Furthermore, it can be trustworthy if photos have not been manipulated intentionally. As many people believe that a photo can describe many words and it would have contains lots of hidden and untold stories. For example, people living in a remote village would accept what they observe in the newspaper.

There are another people who believe that words are much more impressionable than photos. In other words, it plays with people's emotion easily and could cause swift belief about the stories being broadcast everyday. However, the writer can use his/her abilities to poison their mind and make them believe what he believes. In addition, legitimated words could have positive and negative impacts on a person's life. Also, the positive effects can alter the path which the individual choose and would result in a successful career. It also can force the society to do some useful activities which would be beneficial both for the community and for the country.

All in all, it is true that words are more impressive than photos but I believe that photos can describe many things more than words and also in some cases it is trustworthy.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
In many countries news on TV and in a newspapers occasion...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a newspaper' or simply 'newspapers'?
Suggestion: a newspaper; newspapers
In many countries news on TV and in a newspapers occasionally included with photos and I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...elief about the stories being broadcast everyday. However, the writer can use his/her ab...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...have positive and negative impacts on a persons life. Also, the positive effects can al...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d also in some cases it is trustworthy.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in many cases, in other words, in some cases, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96212121212 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59819770478 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.054744199 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.5714285714 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159450787302 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620593999463 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532506224778 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10728839476 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171028743422 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.