News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.
Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
Express your opinion?
Infographics are becoming increasingly popular day by day. Every news story we see in the newspaper or television has a pictorial representation during current times. This essay will argue my opinion favoring usage of pictures while reporting the news, be it electronic or print media.
While reporting news in a newspaper journalists, reporters and editors will ensure that a relevant picture is published at all times. Publishing news articles with suitable, alluring pictures will improve the circulation of their daily. Often, we say a picture speaks thousands of words. By providing images readers can quickly grasp the information. Although certain images are disturbing but the information will have long lasting effect on the brains of the readers.
When a news channel reports the content with pictures, viewership of the channel would be relatively high. Those pictures and speech will ease the cognitive process of public, including the illiterate people. According to an article published in a famous journal, people get captivated to news with relevant pictures. They feel bored to watch plain news without any pictures. For instance, when reporting an accident, if a channel airs the picture of the incident, then viewers would feel more interesting to watch. So, it is always advisable to have a picture associated with the news.
This essay has argued that having a picture while reporting a news item in either print or electronic media is always a positive selling point to the publishers or broadcasters as that will grab the attention of subscribers and would have a long-term effect on their brains. Most of the time information can be converted to infographics for easy understanding of viewers. However, not all articles can be associated with images.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3109540636 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91132198104 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579505300353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8278865235 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4117647059 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76470588235 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196418948458 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647396282065 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521780341591 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118053891416 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041818308116 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.