News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.
Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is your opinion about this?
Images are becoming more and more popular day by day. Every news story we see in the newspaper or television has a pictorial representation during current times. This essay will argue my opinion favoring usage of pictures while reporting the news, be it electronic or print media.
While reporting news in a newspaper, journalists, reporters and editors will ensure that a relevant picture is published at all times, because publishing news articles with captivating photographs will improve the circulation of their daily. Often, we say “A picture is worth a thousand words”. By printing photographs readers can quickly grasp the information. Although violence and amoral images are disturbing, they will have long lasting effect on the brains of the readers.
When a news channel reports the content with pictures, viewership of the channel would be relatively high. Those pictures and speech will ease the cognitive process of public, including the illiterate people. According to an article published in a famous journal, people get attracted to news with relevant pictures rather than seeing a plain text. For instance, when reporting an accident, if a channel airs the picture of the incident, then viewers would feel more excited to watch. So, it is always advisable to have an image associated with the news.
In my opinion, images are more effective compared to content. Images are time saving as they are more informative. For instance, a picture showing the budget in detail is very easy to analyse in fewer seconds compared to big paragraphs. As, the images are time saving, many people feel that they are effective than words.
This essay has argued that having a picture while reporting a news item in either print or electronic media is always a positive selling point to the publishers or broadcasters as that would grab the attention of subscribers with a long-term effect on their brains. Most of the time information can be processed through infographics for easy understanding of viewers. However, not all articles can be associated with images.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34013605442 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92137865349 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6002079774 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.125 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195944844377 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621740291373 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414356460943 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114799488019 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038381768371 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.