Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?
Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience
Nowadays instant cooking has made our life easier. It has saved a lot of time for working women for their family in cooking breakfast and lunch. However, the benefit of nutrients from the traditionally cooked food is slightly missed in the instant meal.
Recently, the Food Safety and Standard Authority of The United Kingdom has banned the two-minutes instant Maggie from Nestle Company due to the preservatives in it causes Chronical Cancer. While, this ban has broken many Maggie Smoodle lovers as it was being a cheap food, time-saving and “anytime anywhere meal”. In other words, ban on this food has resulted in look for an alternative to save time and money. Furthermore, people working on a busy schedule would like to eat while working or vice-versa eg. A Security monitoring surveillance camera may not have leisure time to break out for a meal. Therefore, they grab some small food to eat while watching the blind-spots.
On the flip side, the chunky foods to eat while working has increased obesity because of various factors like less body moment, high calories in such food. Besides, people do not take care to look for proper nutrients presence when choosing the food. Thereby, people gradually end up which some serious disease like Diabetes, Cardiac blocks, abnormal weight gaining and finally body becomes very low-active. Despite, it is better to live with the typically cooked meal than the easy makers. Hence, I believe it is important to save money and time however, it is essential of having concerns on the nutrients while grabbing the quick-meal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun Maggie seems to be countable; consider using: 'many '.
Suggestion: many
...ical Cancer. While, this ban has broken many Maggie Smoodle lovers as it was being a cheap ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 209, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nutrients'' or 'nutrient's'?
Suggestion: nutrients'; nutrient's
...ple do not take care to look for proper nutrients presence when choosing the food. Thereb...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65027219172 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8352648245 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131654907201 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047827641586 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027596224397 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918563448321 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00170656931427 0.056905535591 3% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.