Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. why do you think people waste food? what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away.
As food plays an increasingly more central role in our life. It has been seen that there has been unprecedented incline in food wastage not only in restaurants but also at homes. In spite of several speculations around this nature of throw-away culture, there are certain reasons, and this is a worrying trend that set to continue, however, with some solutions we can arrest this problem.
Even though, the food at restaurants are tasty, sometimes it is overwhelming to eat, this is because of the competition between quality and quality. People often tend to run behind offers such as one-plus-one and discounted food, which leads to excess, and an obvious wastage. On top of that, with the advancements of science in food industries, synthetic food became primary source of consumption, which was frequently supplied to restaurants, and as a consequence the flavor of food is declined, hence, they throw away the food.
Nevertheless, this issue has some simple solutions, one of them is cooking at home, domestic food is always considered as the best food, and as we know the importance and difficulty of preparing it, we seldomly waste it. It has been exemplified in decreasing number of people who are throwing food, when they get home-food in cafeterias of Indian corporate companies. Another point worth considering is to give away excess food to poor, as we know that, one-third of our world population is suffering from an evil which is called poverty, a simple gesture of giving away the excess food to homeless or hunger will shun this problem. There is a NGO known as “Throw-Away? Give-Away!” in Bangalore which is collecting wasted food from restaurants, refactoring them and giving it to poor, which is a great initiative. These are some of the possible solutions for the issue of food wastage
On one hand, there is excess food, and on the other, had hunger. People need to understand the value of food, as in some places of world it is considered as divine on par with education. With simple gesture this issue will be mitigated. I hope in near future there will be no hunger deaths, if these solutions are applied.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As food plays an increasingly more central...
^^
Line 5, column 643, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hunger will shun this problem. There is a NGO known as 'Throw-Away? Give-Awa...
^
Line 5, column 692, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wn as 'Throw-Away? Give-Away!' in Bangalore which is collecting wasted ...
^^
Line 5, column 836, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... which is a great initiative. These are some of the possible solutions for the issue of foo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, third, such as, in spite of, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95027624309 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9172787923 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533149171271 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3285146791 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.466666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332864908399 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115876698869 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659307981482 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202307277556 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754515280858 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.