Nowadays, some buildings such as offices and schools have open-space design instead of separate rooms. Why is it so? Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In this recent modern world, we are able to see the drastic changes everywhere. In the same way, majority of offices and schools are built with open-space floor plan in their premises rather than having individual cabinet rooms. Although, this idea is to be invited because of its pros, does it have its other side. In this essay, I will explain pros and cons of such development and give my opinion about it.
First and foremost reason why these open floor plans are mostly preferred by the organisations and institutions is its cost effective. The huge cost is involved in constructing separate cabinets and in a open design, only the furniture are to be installed. This furnishing works will incur only the less expenses. Furthermore, such a structure at offices will eliminate the discrimination of staff members. All the staff members irrespective of of their grades, should sit together at the same place. This arrangement will also make it easy to get interaction with others and help to find a place for a new comer who joins in the office.
On the other hand, there are some unlikely effects in this kind of seating arrangement. Since all are sitting in a close manner, a staff might feel that he/ she is being watched by others and need some privacy. Moreover, this lack of privacy creates stress and anxiety and in result will be reflected at their works. They are neither active nor productive at works and other activities. In addition, this sort of seating has the possibility of spreading any contagious diseases among the staff members.
In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that these open-space designs have its positive and negative sides equally. Whether to take it on a positive or negative side, completely depending on a position where the viewer is. In my words, it has both.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this recent modern world, we are able...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opment and give my opinion about it. First and foremost reason why these open...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n constructing separate cabinets and in a open design, only the furniture are to ...
^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun expenses is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...is furnishing works will incur only the less expenses. Furthermore, such a structure...
^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...ers. All the staff members irrespective of of their grades, should sit together at th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: NEW_COMER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'newcomer'?
Suggestion: newcomer
...h others and help to find a place for a new comer who joins in the office. On the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a new comer who joins in the office. On the other hand, there are some unlike...
^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a close manner" with adverb for "close"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ting arrangement. Since all are sitting in a close manner, a staff might feel that he/ she is bei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous diseases among the staff members. In conclusion, I would like to reit...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86731391586 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69958008548 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605177993528 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5305345217 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.5555555556 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23537808792 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637493252466 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560165638626 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138166040154 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533681121842 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.