Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advant

Essay topics:

Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.

Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages.

For security reasons, the people are kept under watch using tracking systems and cameras, which has become debatable issue in the country. In some cases, it is not informed to population about observation by machines. A section of society consider this as required step to embolden the national security; nonetheless, I believe that monitoring is essential for safety but that does not mean that population should be kept ignored about being monitored. Moreover, merits of monitoring tools far-weigh its demerits.

To begin with, the propensity of crimes is increasing in recent times, making it essential for government to install closed circuit television (cctv) and other tracking tools to aid in surveillance. In other words, owing to such systems, the patrolling becomes easy and crime-rates can be reduced. Needless to say, this will pose a threat on wrong-doers, as everything will be captured in film, resulting in their punishment for their act. For instance, the rape cases in Delhi have notoriously decreased after installing cctv camera in the capital. Thus, the benefits of keeping people under observatory machines is definitely helpful to keep the country safe.

On the other side, the critics of having tracking systems argue that it takes away the privacy of the people; meaning no one can move freely due to fear of being watch by cameras. Undoubtedly, people will have to think before walking on road or showing love gestures with their loved ones, knowing about being monitored by tools. Even the cellphone taping is common form of tracking where the voice recordings are being saved; this limits the personal talk with the friends and family. Consequently, such monitoring may be the matter of concern for society.

Although privacy is concern, but to keep the nation safe and secured, the surveillance is indispensable need of contemporary world. Notwithstanding the fact that the tracking and monitoring through cameras and cell-phones are required, it can be said that people should be at least informed that they are under monitoring system because to observe someone without their permission is an equal crime.

To sum up, I pen down saying that tracking systems cannot be refused but at least the public should be informed of their being monitored by the system. Although there are few cons in keeping population under watch but the pros of this system are mandatory.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imes, making it essential for government to install closed circuit television cct...
^^
Line 17, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out their permission is an equal crime. To sum up, I pen down saying that tracki...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 162, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...being monitored by the system. Although their are few cons in keeping population unde...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, thus, at least, for instance, in other words, in some cases, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2095959596 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71438687977 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55303030303 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3275443802 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.352941176 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2941176471 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324644871553 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095173748381 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629655085033 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183833463779 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236020846291 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.