Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
Waste management has become a global concern today. The production of waste has increased tremendously in recent years. The amount of waste produced by households and industries is rising at an alarming rate. This essay intends to analyze the root cause of this issue and put forward some suggestions for the government to control it.
To commence with, the increase in population is one of the main reasons for the excessive production of rubbish. It is undeniable that waste production increases when the world population grows. It is also clear and obvious, as promotions increases, the sales volume also increases; As a result, people tend to buy and stock more products than they require and throw them away after a while without using them. To add more to that, people's lifestyle has changed and adapted to use and throw away culture. They prefer to buy plastic bags and water bottles rather than bringing them from home. People don't realize that these plastic materials take more years to get decomposed. Today, all the products are packaged before it is sold. Moreover, they even change the gadgets and electronic appliances frequently, instead of repairing and reusing it. Hence, the production wastes increase.
The solution is not simple, but it does exist. The government can enact strict laws that force companies to use bio-degradable materials for packaging. Campaigns can be promoted in the form of posters, or short video clips to educate and encourage people to recycle items that are made of plastic and glass materials. This will automatically reduce the amount of waste produced.
To recapitulate, every individual should take responsibility to keep the environment green and clean. They should understand the fact that the earth belongs to all living beings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...er than bringing them from home. People dont realize that these plastic materials ta...
^^^^
Line 3, column 847, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...y, instead of repairing and reusing it. Hence the production wastes increase. The ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74057180665 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622837370242 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6493740663 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5263157895 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2105263158 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84210526316 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119614914082 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308708077956 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381044022604 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620288759988 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378331763635 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.