Nowadays, we can watch entertainment performances from the screen (laptop, etc) and no need to watch it live. To what extent do agree.
It is undeniable that watching entertainment performance make everyone zestful and will never be obsolete. However, due to availability of various media channels, mostly, people see these performances on television or smart gadgets, and contend that there is no need to watch it live. I somewhat agree to the latter statement but, one should also contemplate the enthusiasm of the live entertainment shows as well.
Firstly, many people consider watching such events on digital platforms because it is time and cost efficient. As it saves time of travelling to and forth, additionally the price of event tickets will also be not spent. Furthermore, watching these performances digitally can be convenient as well. For instance, a group of people who want to go for a live concert will probably have to do a lot of planning, such as buying tickets, commuting and so on: on the other hand, same group can watch at their own convenience on a digital screen without being frantic. Therefore, for many people, watching entertainment performances on laptops and television can be more feasible.
Nevertheless, one cannot turn away from advantages of live events- especially for young passionate people. This is because, digital screens does not reflect the environment and enthusiasm of such performances. To illustrate this, on televisions or on the internet, many factors may disrupt the enoyability of performances such as advertisements and electricity failure. As a consequence, people will miss many parts of the show. Thus, importance of live entertainment should also be not neglected.
To sum up, although entertainment shows can be enjoyed by many digitally because it is within the comfort zone, however, watching these live are also loved by many passionate individuals. Therefore, both options should be openly available for viewers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lives'?
Suggestion: lives
...ntend that there is no need to watch it live. I somewhat agree to the latter stateme...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38620689655 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16929381812 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0130382286 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.133333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270803634893 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931649741636 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715914834307 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168538166149 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693912076271 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.