Nowadays young people seek older people’s advice in the same way as in the past. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Include your opinion and relevant examples from your own experience.
These days, in the modern world and era, in which we live now, there has been no movement away from older people’s advice by the younger generation. This is very apparent in today’s societies. It is disagreed that young people would follow the older generation’s advices as in earlier times. This will be proven by analyzing how advances in technology as well as a proper upbringing have influenced this perspective.
To begin with, in spite of the fact that advancements in technology have brought substantial changes to our lives, it has also altered the way individuals are apt to accept the previous generation’s recommendations. In advanced nations, for instance, unable to fulfill scientifically and logically alike, the new generation have no tendency to consume their herbal remedies, so chemical drugs are what have been increasingly prevalent among youngsters. Thus, it is clear why some young people less gravitate towards earlier generation tips.
Equally importantly, though, a proper bringing up is another contributing factor which play a vital role to form such stereotypes among younger members of societies. Old adage and proverbs, as an example, which have inherited during centuries are in danger and they are not common in modern families. Today’s parents, if they would allocate more time to transfer such important inheritage to the new generation, they should impact upon adolescents’ behaviors towards the preceding generation’s point of view. Thus, this can be expected that the way young people think bound to be changed towards old beliefs.
For reasons related to both technological advances and a good upbringing, the importance of the older people’s advice will be ignored by teenagers. However, after analyzing them, it is clear that devoting adequate time by today’s families and less attention to recent changes could be beneficial. Thus, the argument that the probability of the new generation would tend to seek older people’s advice cannot be supported and expected to be relatively disappeared.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng have influenced this perspective. To begin with, in spite of the fact that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ious generation's recommendations. In advanced nations, for instance, unabl...
^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncreasingly prevalent among youngsters. Thus, it is clear why some young people ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate towards earlier generation tips. Equally importantly, though, a proper br...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...ier generation tips. Equally importantly, though, a proper bringing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pes among younger members of societies. Old adage and proverbs, as an example, w...
^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they are not common in modern families. Today's parents, if they would allo...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to be changed towards old beliefs. For reasons related to both technologica...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, well, for instance, as well as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54375 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27967223972 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2079828129 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196836709109 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796744274053 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665161057285 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130438801848 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648099602951 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.