In recent years, traffic congestion on town's roads has been increasing and we need to bear in mind that, nowadays, it is a global problem, therefore, a group of people has begun to wholeheartedly believe that the only option to decrease the effect of this problem is to lower the people's need to leave their homes and move to such places as shopping moles, schools and work offices. Speaking for myself, i do not think that it is an aberration, on the contrary, i am quite inclined to this point of view.
To begin with, it is undoubtedly true that people frequently travel to places mentioned above but , thank to the such technology as the Internet, we have got an opportunity to do quite many things online without leaving home. For instance, online shops have appeared and many purchase may be made through them. Likewise, people can do freelance work at home rather than sit at the workplace and, of course, the Internet is like an encyclopedia what means it is a crucial source of knowledge for students easily replacing educational institutions.
Another argument is that reducing of people's need to travel for different areas is the only way to solve the problem with traffic not only for the reason of new devices' existence but also because people will be happy with this solution giving an opportunity to save money on transport. Obviously, if we do not travel, then we do not spend money, what cannot be unpleasant.
Summarizing all written above and taking all illustrations into account, it can be evident that decreasing of traffic congestion by refusing to move to different points of city is the only way because it is possible and profitable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oples need to leave their homes and move to such places as shopping moles, school...
^^
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... and work offices. Speaking for myself, i do not think that it is an aberration, ...
^
Line 1, column 464, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...t it is an aberration, on the contrary, i am quite inclined to this point of view...
^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tly travel to places mentioned above but , thank to the such technology as the Int...
^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... solve the problem with traffic not only for the reason of new devices existence ...
^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'devices'' or 'device's'?
Suggestion: devices'; device's
...traffic not only for the reason of new devices existence but also because people will ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, may, so, then, therefore, for instance, of course, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83216783217 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74101557112 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583916083916 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.5088938251 49.4020404114 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.75 106.682146367 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.75 20.7667163134 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.25 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305252863842 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115291661033 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544418773417 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166114850746 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601199983227 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.