Being fashionable and looking smart have become very common in recent times. Many people follow fashion trends and choose their appearance according to them. I would argue that looking professional is vitally important for employees; nonetheless, it can lead to detrimental phenomenons. This essay will look at causes and results of this development.
On the one hand, having an attractive looking can bring countless positive elements into workers' lives. To begin with, they can land better jobs as one who wear smart, modern attire will portray an image of confident and experienced. For example, a survey by Vocation Portal in 2018 revealed that 90% of employers choose modern looking as a must have feature that candidates have to be employed. Further and more importantly, many workers can promote faster since many companies appreciate representatives who have fashionable and modern style and demand working with them frequently.
On the other hand, this trend can result in innumerable problems. First of all, many people can get into debt as a great deal of money is needed to follow fashion trends. Despite many people have jobs with high financial rewards, shopping in high street names and purchasing make up products at big brand names cost a lot. For instance, a report by National Bank in 2017 reported that 80% of delinquents were women who work as a manager at world renowed companies. Lastly, importance of tertiary education will become less. If having an attractive looking is more important than being expert to get jobs, many students will search new ways to be more beautiful rather than mastering at university.
By way of conclusion, having a good looking is essential in professional life; nevertheless, it can result in financial phenomenons, consequently people should try to have an impressive image but they should not spend more than their budged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'featured'.
Suggestion: featured
...rs choose modern looking as a must have feature that candidates have to be employed. Fu...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould not spend more than their budged.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, lastly, look, nevertheless, nonetheless, for example, for instance, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22368421053 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81391354137 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.155275605 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.866666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175750491465 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593928738974 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446612368901 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122143565165 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445392422301 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.