Pollution and other environmental problems are resulting from the way that many countries are developing and becoming richer. Some think this cannot be avoided.
The countries are developing but along with this advancement and prosperity, the world is facing a tremendous issue of pollution and environmental degradation. A section of society believes the phenomenon to be an unavoidable result of ever progressing world. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the stated argument, believing that steps can be taken to improve the environment and pollution can be reduced.
To begin with, the most efficient way to combat environmental problems is by saving the forest and planting more trees. It is unequivocal that trees purify the air and detoxify the ill effects of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Thus, trees can contribute towards a clean and green world. For example, planting more trees saves the earth from soil erosion along with reducing the levels of carbon monoxide.
Another action can be taken by reducing the usage of private vehicles. The employees can prefer car-pooling and pupils can be sent to school by a shared bus. The reduced traffic would emit less smoke and would prove useful in lowering the pollution level. Additionally, the automobiles should use alternative forms of energy for fuelling their motors. For instance, compressed natural gas can serve as an alternative to petrol and diesel.
Finally, the last but not the least step towards minimizing pollution is to create awareness among people. The government can run programmes to educate the populace on maintaining the pollution-free world. The people should be taught on the hazards of environmental degradation and should be encouraged for using eco-friendly materials instead of plastic and paper. This would alleviate the need of cutting more trees and dumping the plastic in the soil, which is the reason for polluting the land and its resources.
In conclusion, I pen down saying that although development of nations leads to environmental - issues but there are ways to preserve it by saving forests, reducing personal vehicles and running awareness programmes. The government and people together can join hands to mitigate these problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34346504559 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93585541463 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586626139818 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0436721105 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181342326514 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524216169183 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464263181434 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985375881535 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497465599555 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.