Public celeberations (such as national days, festivals etc) are held in most countries. These are often quite expensive and some people say that governments should spend money on more useful things.
Do you agree or disagree?
As people are living in diverse age, they tend to celebrate national as well as religious days. The Government is also economically supporting communities to celebrate these events. It is believed that these festivals cost too much to the government as well as this amount should be spent to avail more robust public services. I completely agree on the said idea. Two primitive reasons to support the aforementioned notion are: Betterment of local infrastructure is more important than spending on special days, Generating employment options is also as important in terms of using treasury fund wisely.
Most nations are suffering from lack of public services. It is surprising that the government has the mammoth amount of money to spend on religious activities and for the national days as well, but when it comes to availing public services or infrastructural improvements then the government often replied with lack of monetary resources. For example, the Indian government often contribute to celebrate occasions like Diwali, Christmas, and Ede but when public demands reparation of several risky national highways then the government is unable to facilitate needed amount.
Consequently, developing and populous countries like India and Pakistan need robust employment options. The government should increase their focus to generate enough jobs in the market, instead blindly spend humongous amount on public celebrations. For example, the Chinese government had significantly reduced the spending on public events and started improving upon government job creation. As a result, now, Chinese citizens are more wealthy and celebrate these events on their own.
To deduce, there is a dire need for the developing country’s government to shift their focus and start thinking in a new direction to facilitate their republicans with basic amenities. It is also imperative that the government should develop a system with all those money to provide better employment opportunities for citizens. Other fund related celebration requirement would be done by citizens itself if the government is able to create enough employment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'those moneys', 'those monies'?
Suggestion: this money; those moneys; those monies
...rnment should develop a system with all those money to provide better employment opportunit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, then, well, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56748466258 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03920863304 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567484662577 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1530259101 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237055755351 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810478263372 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430546812351 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142298253121 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527099068443 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.