Raising the price of the oil will solve the world's environmental problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no denying to the fact that the burning of fossil fuel leads to the environmental issues. A school of thought believes, increasing the crude oil price should resolve this matter as people would drop its usage due to high cost. However, I strongly disagree with the statement, believing that people cannot limit their needs due to price. Although expensive, they will continue to consume it until they have an alternate option to oil.
To begin with, the crude oil is needed in vehicles and the people need to purchase it for fueling their motors and bike for their daily transport. Despite the hefty price, it is obvious that one cannot stop commuting; therefore, he will buy it and use it. Consequently, every single use of petrol or diesel would contribute to environmental degradation and the environmental problem cannot be controlled in spite of the increase in price. For instance, every year the government raises the fuel price but still the number of vehicles in the city continue to increase and the environmental degradation never stops.
The people are habituated with the convenience of using non-renewable sources of energy and they would not ban automobiles and machines running on these sources. Admittedly, this can only be possible if the alternative option is discovered. Thus, environmental hazards cannot alleviate with price-rise but would surely prove beneficial with the eco-friendly option of energy. A very good example of this is compressed natural gas engines which have gained popularity due to its eco-friendly nature.
On the contrary, it may happen that people may reduce the use of vehicles and this, in turn, would improve the environmental conditions. In other ways, people would not frequently use cars and may prefer walking or bicycling for shorter distances. Hence, according to some people, the environment can be benefitted to some extent.
In conclusion, I pen down saying that oil rates do not help in keeping the environment clean. Inventing the creative solutions, which can be used as an alternative option can aid in amending the environment as well as keeping it pure and safe for future generation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in spite of, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16761363636 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89112298871 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556818181818 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8543397662 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7058823529 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142013940455 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460396297832 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356045025195 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754755917213 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462731672598 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.