Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It goes without saying that governments should hold the responsibility for curbing the ecological ravages over the world instead of individuals. This essay will discuss both sides of the fact.
In the first stage, it is clear that the Administration plays a more salient role in protecting the environment. To be clearly stated, in a country where not everyone is conscious of the ecological damage such as desertification or seawater desalination, the government, which has the authority to create and enact the law, should be in the lead of the environmental protection campaign. For instance, in Singapore where possesses the cleanest ecosystem, the fee of car service is twice as much as in other countries. By dint of this measurement, the Government can restrict the use of private transportations and reduce the individual carbon footprint.
However, the citizens can certainly make appreciable efforts in curbing the damage to biodiversity. Firstly, In daily life, some eco friendly substitutes should be commonly used instead of plastic or other disposable materials which have many catastrophic impacts on ecosystem. A typical example can be taken into account is when going shopping , most people tend to use plastic bags and will throw it away as soon as coming home. This leads to the proliferation of non-biodegradable products which can easily contaminate the environment and are the main agents of some infectious diseases.
In short , while I agree the administration should be responsible for the curbing the ravages of biodiversity , I also think that every individual should have sense of environmental protection
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It goes without saying that governments ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y will discuss both sides of the fact. In the first stage, it is clear that the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...educe the individual carbon footprint. However, the citizens can certainly mak...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ividual carbon footprint. However, the citizens can certainly make apprecia...
^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...aken into account is when going shopping , most people tend to use plastic bags an...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in agents of some infectious diseases. In short , while I agree the administrat...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...some infectious diseases. In short , while I agree the administration should...
^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the curbing the ravages of biodiversity , I also think that every individual shou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, while, for instance, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.390625 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31377615214 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61328125 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8821426948 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.454545455 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180455433819 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605649500195 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05834554862 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113009353702 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585059697699 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.