Some people are of the view that mother and father should be in charge of fostering their children equally. Others, however, think that children are treated by only one parent. This essay will elaborate on both perspectives and take a look at the benefits and drawbacks of the family training their children.
There are several advantages to be evenly responsible to their children from father and mother. Firstly, children will be taught in two strong side in their father and mother. For example, children are able to consult with their parent to receive the good recommendation to improve their weak points. Secondly, parent will mentor them in a couple idea. For example, children will be better to use their advices to solve the problems. These factors alone illustrate the benefits of training their children equally.
On the contrary, there are some people who choose to hold an opposing view for various reasons. Nowadays, parents need to support the family by getting a job and only one parent stay at home to mentor children responsibly. As a result, children will get the mental illness only one side of idea to decide the wrong way. For example, mother is addicted the alcohol, children will percept and imitate when children will grow. Moreover, parent will ignore children during the busy time for cleaning the house to fight their children to release their emotion. These issues cannot be overlooked and provide insight into the negatives of treating the children.
In conclusion, the parental experiences are useful for teaching their children in equally, in my opinion, parent are important for mentor children in both viewpoints.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13703703704 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51711562234 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525925925926 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7403558692 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.6875 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162843302832 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760794925767 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703804861401 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117446094254 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438572432633 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.