Some people are of the view that both the mother and father should be in charge of fostering their children equally. Others, however, think that children should be treated by only one parent. This essay will elaborate on both perspectives and take a look at the benefits and drawbacks of combined parenting.
There are several advantages for even responsibility of the children from the father and mother. Firstly, children will be taught from two strong sides in both parents. For example, kids are able to consult with their parents to receive the best recommendations to improve their weak points. Secondly, both parents will mentor them in a couple of ideas. For example, children will be better able to use their advice to solve the problems. These factors alone illustrate the benefits of training their children equally.
On the contrary, there are some people who choose to hold an opposing view for various reasons. Nowadays, parents need to support the family by getting a job and only one parent stays at home to mentor the children responsibly. As a result, children will receive support from one parent, which is not always a good thing. For example, the mother may be addicted the alcohol, and the children will perceive and imitate as they grow up. Moreover, the parent will ignore the children during a busy time. These issues cannot be overlooked and provide insight into the negatives of raising the children.
In conclusion, there are both positives and negatives to raising children by one or both parents. In my opinion, both parents are important for mentoring their children.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03007518797 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56933916784 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522556390977 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.4619657297 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.7058823529 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166615895328 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680302495122 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642681459007 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114967404169 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437846832149 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.