As a result of tourism development, English has become the most popular language. Some people think that it will be the only language to be spoken one day. Do the advantages of having one language outweigh its disadvantages?
It is true that English, the most common language, has spoken on a global scale. It leads to the forecast that it will become the only language to be used someday. Despite some obvious advantages of this trend, I would argue that these are outweighed by the disadvantages.
On the one hand, having a global language would help people in the world reap certain benefits. Firstly and above all, such change would nourish mutual understanding among citizens from different cultural backgrounds. It would be needless to use dictionaries or interpreters to communicate with people from other nations, as long as everyone was to speak the same language. In addition, using only one language could also facilitate trade among countries. This would help enhance a nation’s economic development, which means its citizens would enjoy a superior quality of life.
On the other hand, it is unable to deny the obvious demerits of living in a single-language world. To start with, inferior languages would be forced to vanish under the dominance of a global one. This would also result in the loss of national identity and cultural diversity due to the fact that the new language often brings new culture and customs within. Likewise, traveling to other nations in order to discover cultures, would become pointless. Subsequently, the tourism industry could be put under crisis, which would heavily ruin countries that rely on tourism as its main source of income.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the drawbacks of using only one language on a global scale are more significant than the benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se are outweighed by the disadvantages. On the one hand, having a global languag...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, likewise, so, as to, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09541984733 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7992794198 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587786259542 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0890444005 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.3571428571 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316097369807 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10975183633 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691901635786 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198922496543 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649966145589 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.