The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be made to encourage people to use their cars less and public transport more. Discuss possible ways to encourage the use of public transport.
Indisputably, Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan, to name just a three examples, are facing deteriorated air quality. There are multifarious reasons behind and one of which regards the increased number of private car on road. Therefore, it is the priority task for government to reduce the number of private car. In this essay, we would like to discuss the feasible solution to tackle the issue.
Extending public transport system into different places is the first and foremost solution to reduce the number of private car. Looking back the necessity of owning a private car, it is convenient for them to go everywhere. If the public transport system can cover the places they want and can go as convenient as they own the car, their driving force would be faded out and, finally, give up their own car, reducing number of car on road.
Another suggestive solution is to introduce monetary measurement, ranging from tax such as new car registration tax to penalty of forfeit such as pollutant emission fine, to control the increase of number of private car. As financial burden added on car owner increases, so do the number of private car fall. This solution can not only control the car grow, the additional fund received from tax but also can use to improve the public transport system as mentioned in above paragraph.
To conclude, it is inarguable that the pollutant emitted from car cause a decline of the air quality. Government should take any necessary action to at least mitigate the problem. If we leave it aside and eventually let the problem worse, our place may become uninhabitable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ration tax to penalty of forfeit such as pollutant emission fine, to control the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, may, so, therefore, at least, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94444444444 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69862790925 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7743710848 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.692307692 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213503253028 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757985958965 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458729683335 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122563460707 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035239057466 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.