Routine use of computers by children have more negative effects than positive effects.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons and examples for your opinion
In the era of technological advancement, computers are widely used by children across the globe. Although it is argued by some people that the ever-increasing usage of computers by them daily has more pitfalls than any advantages to young children, I disagree with this argument because computers help them not only in academic subjects but also make them technophile from their young age, whereas drawbacks can be managed easily.
To begin with, it is observed that nowadays young adults spend long hours in front of electronic gazettes like computers which may have detrimental effects on their health, such as blurry vision, severe headache and many more. However, it can be easily manageable by self awareness and monitoring by parents. It is fact that computers make it easy for novices to understand academic subjects with the help of animations, videos. To be more precise, they can clear their doubts in well effective and simple manner. For an example, the “Kidzee” application on computer provides clear understanding of each subjects.
Additionally, if beginners start to use computers from their formative years, it will make them familiar with technology. Eventually, they will become tech savvy. Moreover, it augments certain skills like innovation, strategy designing and implementation while playing video games. For instance, children, who have started use of laptops from their early age, are more intelligent than others and develop holistically.
In conclusion, while there are certain manageable detrimental effects of routine use of computers to children, I believe that computers have more positive effects on their understanding of academic subjects and develop certain valuable skills.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57794676806 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03056375509 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604562737643 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.5893976747 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239885777576 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084348421113 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732191893783 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161790205443 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542369156739 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.