Safety standards are important when building people's homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes – the government or the people who build the homes?
Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
“Safety is better than cure” which owns responsible by various stakeholders it includes the government and the people during the construction of a house. It is important to plan well keep-in-mind about the natural calamities.
It is a government responsibility to inspect the blueprint of the construction from a various angle before approving it. However, it is people the responsibility to abide by the rule. In other words, the Soil inspection team works for the government to know better than the people about the capability of the soil to stand strong against the earthquake. They might have done diligence soil tests before releasing the report. It is the sole responsibility of the people to abid accordingly. For example, if the approval is for building a two-story apartment with sufficient side paths then it should be constructed accordingly. Strange it might seem, but it is a fact, that due to the increased corruption by the promotors construction of the building is slightly different than the approved plan.
In the recent news, Shanhomes building located in the west part of London has faced twenty casualties. Further to the investigation, it was pointed as a poor construction although it is only two years old. The building did not contain any government authorized standards such as rain-water-harvest to channel out the water, Foundation should be from fifty meters deep on the earth, six pillar support than four-pillar support. Because of this, it happened to lose many lives.
In summary, it is not only government responsibility to provoke various building rules but it is also responsible for people to cooperate with the safety measures and standards introduced by the government
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'promotors'' or 'promotor's'?
Suggestion: promotors'; promotor's
... due to the increased corruption by the promotors construction of the building is slightl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 774, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...n of the building is slightly different than the approved plan. In the recent news...
^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
... of London has faced twenty casualties. Further to the investigation, it was pointed as...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, so, then, well, for example, in summary, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26909090909 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24605291148 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549090909091 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3359260264 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280708323252 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874361595771 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744158966442 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176981885716 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642547465683 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.