Scientist and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artist To what extent do you agree

Essay topics:

Scientist and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artist. To what extent do you agree.

When it comes to an innovation that soceity and plays an important role to fight against severe disease, much importance is given to people like scientists and technology team. Though, the role of artist and musician is not less in terms of developing culture and taste towards different field of interest. Here, we will discuss about both before getting agree or disagree.

To begin with, science and technology field is totally different from music and art industry. But, both have their own space and value. The vaccines and medicines which protect us from certain disorders and disease, are a result of continuous efforts taken by technology and science team. These are the ones who work round the clock in a constant way to create something that can be beneficial to modern society. For example, during this pandemic situation that occurred due to Covid, Scientists are the only ones who were in continuous process of making vaccine without looking back. There was a tremendous pressure on them so that lives of many people could be saved and they did it. This is the main reason many of us see them with utmost respect and are more valued.

On the other hand, people in professions such as music and art have greatly benefited with the modern advent of technology. For example, social media platforms like you tube and Instagram have helped many in youngsters to showcase their extra ordinary talent or performance. For example, in a recent time, "Yashraj Mukhate" has become immensely popular by combining his talent of music with serial and their character's dialogues. He has a huge fan following that shows how such talents are equally important.

In conclusion, science and technology have transformed land scape of art and music industry through innovations in technology.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a constant way" with adverb for "constant"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e are the ones who work round the clock in a constant way to create something that can be benefic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09121621622 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65864211993 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1914956761 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.466666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115592190779 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332661716484 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0209181193185 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0613141010147 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03023196256 0.056905535591 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.