Environmental problems are mushrooming rapidly all around the world due to the carelessness of people towards the environment. It is stated that scientists think that for saving the atmosphere individuals need to utilise less energy on daily basis. Nonetheless, majority of people have not altered the style they live. There are some reasons behind not prioritizing individual steps by people. However, several approaches can also be taken to motivate individuals to take action. Both the reasons and encouragement ways will be discussed in forthcoming paragraphs before writing a conclusion.
It cannot be denied that personal action against large energy consumption is needed. However, due to some considerable factor it seemed unthinkable. The worthmentioning reason behind this is that lack of awareness among people regarding how much energy should be used daily. For instance, India has been using fuels from several decades excessively and now environment of this country is totally polluted and fuels are on the way of running out. The another factor beyond this is that people do not considering their responsibility to save environment owing to busier lifestyle and they are not thinking forward that their individual steps can make the situation under control. Hence, it is enough to prove that why people not giving preference to take personal actions.
To curb the problem, there are numerous approaches that could be adopt by environmentalists and authorities to encourage people to take action. Firstly, awareness campaigns need to be launched regarding energy resources in every Nation and on social media. For example, Australia used campaigns in 2012 about using energy appropriately and it became successful to make the individuals aware to create point against high energy usage. Secondly, government should provide the support and motivation if a person will speak about environmental issues. Therefore, it seemed clear that if these ways will not be taken, growing problems can pose a threat to atmosphere as a whole.
In conclusion, after analysing both reasons and encouragement methods I personally feel that some factors are responsible for making the people neglect towards environmental issues. However, these circumstances can be controlled with the combined efforts of people and government.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5308988764 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04964990406 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.42947546 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.631578947 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7368421053 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307926320174 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884709181486 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06330638444 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184426886483 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654875520134 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.