Scientists have been warning from many years about environmental protection and we should limit the use of energy in daily lives. What are the reasons for that? How to encourage people to take an interest towards environment protection?
Environmental problem is one of the most worrying argument in recent days. Scientists are always been insisting us to take care of environment and to reduce the usage of energy sources which create pollution in our day to day life. Every individual is responsible to protect their surrounding neat and clean. I will give the reasons for the ignorance of people and how can we motivate people to take remedies for controlling pollution.
On one hand, as modern technologies developed people are habituated to use fuel gas for cooking and also, usage of plastic and polythene has drastically increased. Indeed, these two are most dangerous things which are the reasons in rise of pollution. Also, industries in different places create huge environmental effects. For example, clothing industries release heavy amount of wastage into rivers and canals after the process of production. However, it results in water pollution. Accordingly, individual vehicles like car have also existed large in number which effect the air. Accordingly, Individuals are using too much of plastic materials which take much time to dissolve in soil.
On the other hand, people must be thought with the results of using different kinds of materials which spoils the environment. Consequently, schools must include recycling and reuse of things they use in their daily life. At the same time, they should have some practical teaching sessions and conduct exams on it. This will change their mind set and make them to keep in practice.
After having considered all the above discussed points, we can finally draw a conclusion that individuals must be well known with the results of using nonbiodegradable materials so that they will be thinking a while before using them in their regular life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: large
...ual vehicles like car have also existed large in number which effect the air. Accordingly, Indi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, finally, however, if, so, then, well, while, as for, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22727272727 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81392944722 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597902097902 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4276222749 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204272739772 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560126099843 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470784799787 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119919197768 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696518540592 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.