Recently, the phenomenon of digitalized gadgets and their multi-task ability to provide information on various topics has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question ''What are the advantages and disadvantages of using digital gadgets in the libraries?'' Whereas it is a widely held view that digital gadgets are beneficial to help people find information, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, better learning is bound up inextricably with reading desk books, which indicates they lead to both better results and better searching. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2015 demonstrates the relationship between a successful finding of information and digital books in the library as well as an exponential increase in the number of readers. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of digital gadgets is correlated positively with not only better educational outcomes but also more convenient searching experience.
Within the realm of technology, without the slightest doubt, more convenient searching experience attribute to better educational outcomes, in that it would come down to time-saving research, convenient searching, and faster reading. A salient example of such attribution is digitalized searching gadgets, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take technology for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint searching problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of digital gadgets in making searching in the library a better experience.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes ''all's well that ends well,'' after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that digital gadgets are beneficial to help people find information, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69333333333 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1742015619 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4734721415 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.8 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195278329942 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773294279109 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886753563522 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12168020308 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915042355565 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 50.2224549098 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.