Human beings are all born equal. it does not matter what kind of colour, race or skin they have. Everyone should be treated respectfully and keeping their dignity in tact. I know this world has so many different nations existing with every part consisting of either wealthy, developing or poor countries. There always arises a question should these big, strong and wealthier counterparts needs to share their affordability of food and education with their neighbours who still struggle in these departments or if it is the responsibility of the governments that were elected by their citizens to look after their livelihood.
I think if someone is capable of enjoying life in every aspect of comfort why should it not be shared with others. In this case the developed nations are living life as king-size as they have managed every bit of need their citizens desire. In general they can share it with the other weaker nations as it can be a great opportunity to put those nations on the world map and make them believe in equal treatment. Hunger is a problem that can destroy any economy but if the bigger nations like USA, Russia, China just to name a few can make their contribution will make the countries like India, Africa, Pakistan who are somewhat lacking in these departments become more stronger and better. even their chosen ministries and parliamentarians will do a great job ensuring the needs of all their people of any class or caste can be met properly.
Education is the second most important parameter that needs attention. No country or nation can succeed without proper literacy among their people as it can somehow become the tool to develop the technology and resources for a better future and can prove to be a bigger catalyst in changing the nation's status from underdeveloping to developing and even developed if worked upon properly. Leaders and the dignitaries are trying their best to make this feat possible but they still need the monetary support which can be provided by the big leagues as they have organisations like the UNICEF, IMF, ADB which can prove to be life savers for these countries with a high illiteracy rate.
To conclude this, I think if both wealthy, developed and stronger nations join hands with the poorer nations and with their governments can make a detrimental and catastrophic change in the whole world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
Human beings are all born equal. it does not matter what kind of colour, ra...
^^
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: IN_TACT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'intact'?
Suggestion: intact
... respectfully and keeping their dignity in tact. I know this world has so many differen...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...gnity in tact. I know this world has so many different nations existing with every part consis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 665, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...hat lacking in these departments become more stronger and better. even their chosen ministrie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 691, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...tments become more stronger and better. even their chosen ministries and parliamenta...
^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...to be a bigger catalyst in changing the nations status from underdeveloping to developi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, so, still, i think, in general, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9025 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69069577433 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.7027978181 49.4020404114 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.071428571 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320686898583 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108894505095 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724584686495 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216386505725 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527919194545 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.