Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth and resources among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves?
Some people deem that rich countries should help less affluent nations by providing them with money and their assets. While others believe that government of under developing nations should look after their natives by themselves. This essay will bring forth my opinion which inclines former notion. Firstly, it will develop a feeling of brotherhood among countries. Secondly, there will be equal distribution of resources among the sharing countries.
The first and foremost reason is that sharing assets and money will create a feeling of brotherhood among the respective countries which in turn will be beneficial in many ways. For instance, this will bring peace and harmony between those countries and by doing so, these countries will become role models for the rest of the world.China and Pakistan are doing import and export of things which is enhancing the economy and polishing the relations among both countries.
Another reason is that this will lead to equal distribution of resources which will create equal job opportunities for the citizens of both the nations. It is seen that under developing countries usually have large population which creates problem for their government to generate employment opportunities. Further, western countries pay a large sum of money to their people working in online sectors and customer care services. Therefore, affluent countries can set up their online operations or customer care services in these poor nations at less prices. This will benefit both the nations and will bring the talent on the stage.
To conclude, it’s imperative that affluent countries should come forward to help the poor nations to bring a feeling of togetherness and to make sure that everyone is getting a bit of the resources the world have.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: China
...e role models for the rest of the world.China and Pakistan are doing import and expor...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun prices is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... care services in these poor nations at less prices. This will benefit both the nati...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28621908127 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64519673452 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519434628975 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1055600709 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.076923077 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205617346564 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088210069503 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709758027836 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138583352722 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805405294627 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.