Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.
Smoking not only is harmful to smokers' health but also has negative impacts on passive smokers. I am inclined to believe that smoking ban in enclosed places could be considered as an effective solution to protect second-hand smokers as well as smokers.
The smoking ban which imposed in public places plays a major role in health benefits. According to the doctors' claims, smoking can lead to chemical arterial irritation which frequent arterial inflammation can cause a decrease in blood-flow and results in heart attack. Furthermore, secondhand smokes could affect people's cardiovascular system.
Entitlement of smoking ban law might help to plunge the number of cigarettes that an individual smokes per day. Based on scientific evidence smokers crave for nicotine when inhaling tobacco on regular basis, under a smoking ban the rate of tobacco inhalation reduce and as a result of the smoking decrease as well. For example, a person whose friend next to him starts smoking very likely to feel that it is the time for smoking even if he has smoked an hour earlier.
The smoking ban has an efficient impact on saving money. it is undeniable that smoking ban reduces the rate of smoking, then the relative diseases of smoking disappeared consequently. This means the insurance health costs and taxes for emergency rooms visits in the hospitals decrease not only for smokers but also for non-smokers. For Instance, in nations which imposed the smoke banning law proved evidently a strong fall in the rate of emergency visits because of heart attack and besides the health issues, it has economic benefits for the nation.
In summary, while there are several compelling arguments on banning cigarette smoking, I profoundly believe that banning law could be an effective way to protect citizen health in public places as well as help smoker to give up smoking or reduce costs which are caused by smoking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...as an efficient impact on saving money. it is undeniable that smoking ban reduces ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, second, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in summary, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14743589744 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6709700853 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4391506352 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.538461538 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348221718299 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152101872554 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632709611978 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214752770851 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521244936471 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.