Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Smoking is one of the habits that not only kills the smoker but also makes the life of others more miserable because of its ill effects on them too. Both aspects must be discussed before reaching a reasoned conclusion.
There are multifarious points to endorse my acceptance towards the central viewpoint. Firstly, tobacco in any form of smoking is injurious to health as it contains carcinogenic agents. Although, by knowing this fact, people engage in consuming it. They not only playing with their life as well as others. To illustrate, if a pregnant mother or a child standing nearby a smoker and act as a passive smoker. No one can imagine that this can cause serious birth malformations in new born and certain health issues in the child development. Moreover, the consumer suffer from cancers of mouth, throat and lungs later on in their lifespan. Consequently, smoking must be banned to preserve the health of masses.
There are manifold attributes that are opposing the former view. To embark with, first and foremost, business market shuts down by putting ban on smoking. To be specific, smoking is most popular in the pubs, clubs so when it is banned the business closes and this leads to financial crisis among those investors. Apart from this, there must be building of certain designated areas in the society where smoking is permitted so that smokers do not go here and there. Moreover, non smokers do not enter into those zones. This effort will result into separation of active smokers from others.
To recapitulate, smoking is not a healthy habit for anyone. Although, smoking cause serious health issues on every section of the society especially, newborns, this must be banned by using certain strategies so that the certain businesses does not suffer later on.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, well, apart from, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01677852349 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60274003008 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593959731544 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8771351031 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0555555556 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5555555556 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218878603805 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646514679204 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561410082048 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135493932986 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029957331098 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.