The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?

It is believed that a prohibition on all types of advertising would benefit the community since its pointless and sometimes detriment. It seems to me that, this statement is highly subjective and therefore I disagree with it.

As a matter of fact, it is ill-founded to argue that advertising is purposeless and harmful. In particular, advertising in related to customers about newly -launched goods with innovative features which can enhance their quality of life. This can be demonstrated by famous laptop brands, especially Dell, HP which spent big budgets on marketing and promotion. Thanks to these campaigns, consumers can make obvious comparisons before they decide to spend their money. Enterprises, as a result of successful advertising, would thrive and in turn, contribute to society’s well-being through the tax system. The more products they sell, the more tax they have to pay to assist the Authority with such fields as education, health-care, transportation.

Apart from the concerns expressed above, I perceive that it is almost impossible for a nation to prosper without the advertising industry. Firstly, an abundance of jobs for those who work in the advertising field would be redundant, if the state imposes a restriction on all kinds of advertising. In consequences of such law does not only cause loss of revenue of the taxation but also make a large variety of joblessness. Subsequently, not only do the numbers of residual unemployment make up a heavy burden to the Government, but it also decreases the investment of the state in improving the standard of the education system to create the human resources, who have a high standard in order to serve the development of the country. Additionally, instead of using public funding for unemployed people, they can utilize to resolve urgent problems, especially environmental pollution and climate change.

In conclusion, as far as I concerned, the merits of the advertising are obviously unable to deny and therefore I completely disagree with this.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, apart from, in conclusion, in particular, as a matter of fact, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29721362229 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19905489307 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609907120743 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9924464194 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.214285714 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189650291972 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563236196591 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374407416628 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101879350471 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221308667481 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.