Some business prohibits smoking in any of their offices, some governments have banned smoking in all public places. Do you agree or disagree that this is the right course of action? Give some reasons and your opinion.
It is true that a large variety of companies and a number of authorities impose a restriction on smoking in workplaces and public areas. As far as I am concerned, smoking should not completely be forbidden by the above-mentioned organizations even though it can be harmful.
On the one hand, it can not deny the fact that there is a group of perks that individuals and states could reap certainly from smoking. For the best, it is demonstrated that people can enhance their working capacity and boost concentration ability when they use tobaccos. Not to mention that smoking also helps people unwind after they are tired of working. In regard to the economic perspective, firms producing cigarettes could contribute to the national budget of governments through the tax system. As a result, authorities could allocate this amount of money from tax obtained to urgent issues such as environmental protection and infrastructure development, which means not only releasing the heavy burden on states but also creating millions of jobs for employees who are serving in the tobacco industry.
On the other hand, despite these vivid positive effects, there are many major drawbacks to smoking too. Firstly, using tobacco is a potential contributing factor behind the number of diseases consisting of lung cancer, heart attacks and asthma sue to the fact that each tobacco contains thousands of poison and chemicals. Not only smokers but also people surrounding could suffer from the smoke of cigarettes. Secondly, image if millions of people addict to smoking and they have to spend a large amount of money to meet fully their demand and expend treating related causes of disease, a huge budget is wasted unnecessarily. Therefore, instead of spending on smoking, they can use this amount of money to invest in education in order to pave the way for their career path.
In conclusion, the world would be a better place without smoking. However, the decision of whether to smoke comes down to each individual to make. Smoking should not be banned completely, people should not also use tobacco in public areas or in rooms where there are non-smokers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in regard to, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08781869688 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83674238376 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563739376771 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3054284346 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.733333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113555997526 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401875794379 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281340787024 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745869993456 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186488844648 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.