Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?
Nowadays, due to constantly increasing population accommodation demand has increased as well. Thus, authorities of some municipal areas tackle this issue by constructing high-rise buildings. Meanwhile, there are cities that address it by using a much wider area for construction. In this essay, I will consider which solution is more beneficial.
On the one side are those residential areas, which are under construction of skyscrapers. This approach is suitable for those urban areas where lands are limited, while population-dense is high. Thus, vertical planning is the best solution for high-density cities because this away it is easier to satisfy housing demand and provide infrastructure for it. For example, Hong Cong is situated on a group of Islands and the city is one of the most populated cities.
On the other side are those built-up areas where citizens prefer to build accommodation in widespread areas. This course of action is feasible in case if a city has vast empty lands surrounding it, which can be available and suitable for residential construction. This method provides the opportunity to create a balanced environment where low-rise buildings naturally alternate trees and park zones. In addition, this kind of built-up is more practical and safe in earthquake hazardous regions such as my hometown that is surrounding by a mountain range.
In conclusion, both sides have their merits and there is no best option or one solution for all cities. This is because both approaches solve specific problems and proceed from the conditions of an area.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.332 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05021704146 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.636581052 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.2142857143 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208189690136 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641086375928 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526721029491 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111497820894 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339695540405 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.