In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior (строгие правила поведения), while in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they want (делают почти все что хотят).
To what extent should children have to follow rules?
Two days ago, I read an article about two types of parenting in Kazakhstan. In the article, some politicians state that parents should take a full control over children's behavior. However, some social workers argue that parents should permit children to act independently. In this essay, I will discuss both points of view and agree with the idea of permissive parenting.
Let us start with the reasons why some politicians think that parents ought to restrain the behavioral boundary of their children. The first reason is that it can help children become more respectful. Many old people, for example, complain that contemporary children treat other people discourteously, because their parents are excessively soft to them, but if they were stricter with them, these children would respect others greatly. Another reason is that it usually assist them to avoid many social problems. Plenty of young people easily integrate into society, when their parents entirely supervise their conduct from childhood, since they instill them the rules of courteous conduct both at colleges and work. Therefore, after the analysis of these reasons, it is clear that parenting should be authoritative.
Nevertheless, some social workers advocate that it is important to allow children to do everything with little parental supervision. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, it frequently teaches children to be responsible. In permissive families, many youngsters, for instance, learn to think twice, before they give a promise to do something, since they understand that they have to keep it at any cost. Secondly, it generally stimulates early maturity. Many children become mature sooner compared with their peers from authoritative households, as their parents grant them more opportunities for self-expression. As a result, after the consideration of these arguments, it is obvious that children should not be restricted in their rights.
In conclusion, although some politicians support the idea of being stricter to children in behavior, I believe that parents should allow their children to express themselves freely.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5762195122 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93208211303 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582317073171 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 2.10420841683 475% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0117911412 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.611111111 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181519616582 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586957839425 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515943224378 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120925176865 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357140920374 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.