It is certainly true that the eating habits of people have been significantly changed over the past few years. In many countries, people are frequently intaking junk foods which has negatively impacted their health. Therefore, while many people claim that the government should increase the taxes on restaurant foods, I believe that it will not be a more effective way than other solutions to curb the issue.
First of all, why people argue that imposing the higher taxes will benefit because It is more likely that due to adding extra load on their budgets, people especially young children will avoid having pizzas and burgers. Consequently, that would be more effective to control the spike of digestion system related issues. Furthermore, the restaurants will be indirectly enforced to offer healthy and nutritious foods at a cheaper rate. Also, it will help promote home cooking as well.
However, there are many other ways to control this growing menace rather than increasing tax prices because mostly wealthy people are very often having these types of food and making food costly would not make much difference for them. Therefore, spreading awareness about the health issues caused by outside food will be more effective than the proposed suggestion. In New Zealand, food diet awareness campaigns significantly helped them to deteriorate this issue.
Secondly, the other reason is the cost effective feature of such foods over the other healthy food options. In addition, they are ready to eat or prepared in minutes. Hence, making healthy and nutritious food items cheaper than such types of foods will effectively tackle this issue.
To conclude, I pen down by writing that rather than imposing more taxes on fast food, reducing prices of healthy food items and increasing their availability and awareness campaigns will be more helpful to overcome the issue and to improve their health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...n will avoid having pizzas and burgers. consequently, that would be more effective to contro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24836601307 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53487781487 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8912805833 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212466031475 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076643032289 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465578593321 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133159118648 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339122827003 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.