Some employers offer their employees subsidised memebership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so.
Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and reach a conclusion.
Certain employers provide extra pre-paid activities for their personnal, hoping that it will increase personnal's productivity and make them healthier, however, a different kind employers see no meaning and benefit in doing so. In this essay, the both points will be considered and disscussed.
First and foremost, it can be noticed that overall workers' performance indeed might be reinforced, if some extra outdoor activities will be provided for them. For example, if employee will receive sponsored by employer vacations and take advantage of it, then he or she possibly will appreciate it, and furthermore will show a better results during its work time. Another words, the fact that employer did show some care may raise the incentives of the worker to perform the given task more efficiently. Thus, the so-called job satisifacation can be in itself a motivating factor.
Conversely, if employer decides to not to do anything in terms of a provided leisure time for their personnal, then it most likely will result in negative overall performace of employees. Example of this, can be walkouts or other sort of protests organised by unhappy workers. Consequently the company may start to lose money by losing the profit gained from increased workers' performance. Thus, it is essentially vital for company to include as a part of managment course, the pre-paid leisure activities for their personnal.
In conclusion, it can be confidently conveyed, while health-related subsidies are superficially attractive, the lack of measurability is a substantial drawback. Spending funds on ongoing training would appear to be a better use of company .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'employer'?
Suggestion: employer
...em healthier, however, a different kind employers see no meaning and benefit in doing so....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...oremost, it can be noticed that overall workers performance indeed might be reinforced,...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: ANOTHER_WORDS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in other words'?
Suggestion: In other words
... a better results during its work time. Another words, the fact that employer did show some c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hing in terms of a provided leisure time for their personnal, then it most likely...
^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce of employees. Example of this, can be walkouts or other sort of protests organ...
^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...protests organised by unhappy workers. Consequently the company may start to lose money by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rformance. Thus, it is essentially vital for company to include as a part of mana...
^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...uld appear to be a better use of company .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41312741313 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06602879053 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640926640927 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.96805917 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.833333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23229573501 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783668313387 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709204672922 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141669090991 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109523196212 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.