It is a commonly held belief that learning a foreign language at primary school is more effective. From my point of view, although there are a number of drawbacks involved in this trend, the benefits accruing to children are manifold.
To begin with, The most rational justification is that force children to learn a foreign language who can not even understand their mother's tongue properly could be extremely demanding and pose a threat to them. A good illustration of this is a limited group of children who prove confused and refuse to even talk and communicate, not dominating any of the languages. Moreover, learning at an early age may stay them away from childhood's plays. To put it differently, the more children spend their time learning, the less they can interact and play with their peers. This trend could adversely affect their social skills and fewer their chance of being exposed to different ideas and beliefs.
However, the benefits are by no means negligible. Children's learning ability at primary age has a frantic pace not scaring of making mistakes. Admittedly, they learn new things faster and more efficiently. Take kids with just four and five years old who can speak two or even more languages as an example. They learn another language with special methods and communicate with it as a native person. They, furthermore, have more time and energy to learn. Because students in secondary schools have the aim to pass exams and go to university, consequently, they could not spend much time on initiatives such as studying a different language.
In conclusion, considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that learning new languages in primary school could be more rewarding and lay a foundation for the emergence of new skills that could help children to improve themselves in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03246753247 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7574857101 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.994480041 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2253924783 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760770906359 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683004969381 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153252283321 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455607602269 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.