Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
According to some linguistics, begin studying a foreign language at primary school is better for kids than doing it in secondary or higher school. Although this issue has caused some conflict, its advantages still outweigh the disadvantages.
On one side, letting the child learn a language too early does have some detrimental effect. Firstly, primary students are still learning their mother languages. Being taught another language may cause confusion. As a result, none of those languages are studied in advance. Secondly, not all kids want to get this knowledge. If they are forced to study what they don’t want, they will refuse and start to hate it. Around me, there are so many children, whose parents are English teachers, end up remember nothing after having stressful English lessons with their family.
On another side, students can have many benefits if they start communicating by another language early. First and foremost, younger people tend to acquire faster and more efficiently than older. It is because their brains are growing so that they are able to remember things quickly. The next advantage of being young is that kids don’t get distracted. The older you become, the busier you are. As a high school student, I wish I had learned English sooner. At the moment, I literally don’t have much time for foreign languages because of schoolwork. Furthermore, a young one language’s approach is funnier and somehow relaxing, since they don’t need it for work or scholarship. Children have a long time to acquire the skill slowly and strongly.
Overall, despite having some disadvantages, it is greater for students to learn foreign languages at primary school rather than secondary school due to its huge advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tages still outweigh the disadvantages. On one side, letting the child learn a l...
^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dary school due to its huge advantages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20921985816 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67492731773 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1238252117 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.3157894737 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8421052632 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.10526315789 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36745715326 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097799396426 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135657154205 0.0667982634062 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294686577864 0.151304729494 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177159475356 0.056905535591 311% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.